For all the details, read his full explanation on how the Top Speed values were calculated accurately. Note: The Real Top Speeds of the vehicles have been accurately tested by Broughy1322 in a long straight line with the vehicles fully upgraded. The Best Selling Cars in GTA Online, Ranked by Highest Resale Price.Your comparison is more inaccurate and more deceptive. List of Fastest HSW Cars in GTA Online for PS5 & XSX (Hao's Special Works) The Armored Boxville is not armored, it does not live up to its name and is a bit deceptive.GTA 5 & GTA Online: List of Vehicles by Feature.GTA 5 Online Vehicle Armor Guide: Best Armored Cars Ranked. The Fastest Bikes in GTA 5 Story Mode Ranked by Top Speed.The Fastest Bikes in GTA Online: Ranked by Top Speed.The Fastest Cars in GTA 5 Story Mode: Ranked by Top Speed.How to get your Brute Armored Boxville You can buy the Brute Armored Boxville at a cost of 2 200 000 - 2 926 000 at Warstock Cache & Carry. Model Name Display Name Image ninef: 9F: ninef2: 9F Cabrio: blista: Blista: asea: Asea: asea2: Asea: boattrailer: Boat Trailer: bus: Bus: armytanker: Army Trailer. The weight of this vehicle is 7500 kg / 16535 lbs. The engine power is delivered to the rear wheels. The Fastest Cars in GTA Online: Ranked by Top Speed The top speed of the Brute Armored Boxville is 120 km-h / 74.56 mph based on the data in the game files.The Most Expensive Vehicles in GTA Online & GTA 5: Ranked by Price.The Best & Fastest Vehicles in GTA Online & GTA 5: Ranked by Class The top speed of the Brute Armored Boxville is 120 km-h / 74.56 mph based on the data in the game files.A cross-country family vacation in an RV is an American rite of passage. To browse through all the vehicles included in GTA 5 & GTA Online, with custom filters and the ability to sort by any statistics and specifications, see the complete GTA 5 & GTA Online Vehicles Database. Brute Boxville Brute Boxville Brute Armored Boxville Brute Armored Boxville.
0 Comments
With a Ryzen 2700 & the RX470, during GPU assisted encoding CPU = ~20%, GPU = ~50% - AVC without GPU assist CPU = ~ 30%, GPU = 0 - H.265 CPU = ~93%, GPU = 0. The H.265 encoder is not set up as well - of the 3 it was the only one that showed noisy artifacts, plus the larger file size - so again not a completely accurate comparison. To try and get a hint of the converter's performance without GPU assist & with encoding settings not tuned just for speed, I encoded the same clip with the same settings to H.265, which is *very roughly* similar, and it took just a little longer than the GPU assisted AVC conversion, with a file size of almost 138 MB. That alone would make the GPU assisted encoding take longer. The AMD encoder used something called CABAC - the X264 encoder settings did not - which takes more processing, both encoding & viewing, but being more efficient, creates smaller files. Using the AMD GPU assist, it took just over 6 minutes with a file size of 117 MB - it took less than 1/2 that time with the GPU assist off, with a file size of 120 MB. I converted 10 minutes worth of a 1080p AVC video with a max bit rate of 29.7 Mb/s to AVC 720p at a fixed bit rate of 1.5 Mb/s. Unfortunately I can't measure the difference in performance, because with the AMD GPU assist turned off, the hard coded X264 encoder settings are tuned more for speed than quality or efficiency, so the results don't really match. I tested using an AMD graphics card, and rather than using the pretty limited hardware acceleration available with the X264 H.264/AVC encoder that's included in ffmpeg, the Aiseesoft converter went the extra mile and used AMD's GPU-based encoder. Aiseesoft Total Video Converter, while well-polished, is basically your more-or-less average ffmpeg converter with additional capabilities for GPU assisted re-encoding. |